Parliament''s Review of Judicial Appointments




Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein made history this week by becoming the first nominee to the Supreme Court of Canada to appear before an all-party parliamentary committee to answer questions at a public hearing.

Supporters of this change in process tout it as a move towards openness and accountability. But critics warn that it runs the risk of politicizing the nation’s highest court.

Who should have the final say on the constitutionality of legislation, Parliament or the courts?

How relevant is the American experience of appointing Supreme Court judges?

Speaker: Cameron D. MacLennan, B.Sc, LLB, LLM

Mr. MacLennan is a partner in the firm Huckvale, Wilde, Harvie, MacLennan, LLP, Lawyers and Mediators, Lethbridge. He has been an active member of the Law Society of Alberta since 1985, and the Virginia State Bar in the United States since 1992.

Join SACPA on YouTube

In order to ask questions of our speaker in the chat feature of YouTube, you must have a YouTube account and be signed in. Please do so well ahead of the scheduled start time, so you’ll be ready. Go the YouTube Live link provided in this session flyer and on the top right of your browser click the “sign in” button. If you have Google or Gmail accounts, they can be used to sign in. If you don’t, click “Create Account” and follow along. Once you are signed in, you can return to the live stream and use the chat feature to ask your questions of the speaker. Remember you can only participate in the chat feature while we are livestreaming.